Sony’s Playstation TV disappoints

The Sony Playstation TV was released in the US a few weeks ago, and so far the reviews seem to picture it as an underwhelming device. Looking at the titles of the reviews alone paints a sad picture for Sony’s latest device:

  • Small in size, smaller in scope (IGN)
  • Gaming power needs some tweaks (mashable)
  • Playstation TV Promised A Lot But Primarily Fails To Deliver (inquisitr)
  • Playstation TV isn’t ready for Prime time (Yahoo)
  • A waste of money for Vita fans (The Verge)

The Playstation TV has great ambitions, to be both a TV Set top box and a gaming device.

Sony have been pushing gaming features such as their PS3 Games streaming service “Playstation Now”, and the PS4 remote connectivity, that allows players to cast the PS4’s screen in another room. Useful in theory, if your significant other, or kids are watching Netflix on the main TV, where the PS4 is connected.

There are basically two sides to the Playstation TV: the gaming experience, and the broader “entertainment” experience (music, movies…).

Gaming performance

When it comes to gaming, the reviews are mixed:

On the good side, Techradar praises the “World class gaming pedigree” and the “cheapest game console on the market” (curiously forgetting about the Fire TV, and which does not require an additional expensive memory card to actually work).  Mashable liked the “Full Playstation 4 experience” offered by streaming and the “lot of Vita titles available for download“. Kotaku call it the “JRPG dream box“, based on the available Vita and PSP titles. IGN mention that with the right setup, “Remote play works spectacularly“.

On the bad side of the gaming experience, ign regrets that “many Vita games don’t work at all, including some of the biggest titles around“; Wololo goes further and clarify that only “18% of Vita games are compatible with the PSTV“, concluding “In general, you don’t care that the device supports 150 vita games, if your 3 or 4 favorite games are not on the compatibility list.“. CNET complains that “remote play is laggy“. BGR say they “noticed some slowdown and the DualShock 3 wasn’t quite as responsive as [they] would have hoped“. The verge says “after playing around with the PS TV for the past week, I’m not sure why I’d ever really use it“.

In general, even for the reviews on the positive side, reviewers are warning against the price of the PS Now service, the potential lags of PS4 remote play, and the frustrations that can be brought by the fact that the PS TV is not compatible with all games. The Playstation TV fails to impress on the gaming side, except maybe for the Techradar reviewer who wrote that “Gaming shines” on the PS TV.


The main issue though is on the “TV” box side. And this is what we care the most about here at MakeSmartTV. Reviewers are unanimous that the PS TV totally fails as a set top box at its release. Techradar writes: “By far the biggest head-scratcher about PlayStation TV is its lack of the mainstream streaming video services“. IGN concurs: “you won’t actually find apps for Netflix, Amazon Instant Video, and many other top services—even if they’re available on Vita.[…]not getting major content providers onboard is another head-scratcher of a decision.

It goes on: “Major streaming services such as Netflix and Hulu Plus are noticeably absent.” (CNET) . “Lack of entertainment apps means it can’t compete with many set-top boxes” (mashable). “there are so few functional media apps on PS TV at launch that it cannot be considered a set-top box” (bgr). “options are incredibly limited at this time. You’ve got Sony’s Video Unlimited dealio, Crackle, Crunchyroll’s streaming anime service and some sort of concert streaming app that barely counts. ” (Kotaku) “is it a strange attempts on Sony’s side to push their own video on demand and music streaming (Music Unlimited) services?” (Wololo).

Could it improve?

Customer reviews on Amazon confirm the critics reviews: The Playstation TV was not ready for launch, in particular on the media side. Overall, the device has been receiving bad to mediocre ratings in both user and professional reviews. The question though is, could software updates improve the device with time?

Most of the reviewers are hoping this will happen, showing some hope in their headlines or in the review itself: “Big ambitions” (CNET), “Huge potential on the horizon” (mashable), “most promising set-top box on the market” (bgr), “perhaps some firmware updates will solve its compatibility and connectivity issues.” (Yahoo).

Others are much more skeptical. Wololo says: “there was no specific effort, in the course of one year, to increase the compatibility of Vita games with the PS TV [in Japan]. In other words, if your favorite Vita game does not work on the PS TV at launch, there are good chances it will never work on it.“. BGR, in the same line of thoughts: “given the current pace of PS4 software updates, I’m not holding my breath [for vita tv updates].

Bottom line is, we do not recommend the Playstation TV as a set top box replacement at this point. It might improve if mainstream services make it to the box, but it just doesn’t compete against the many other solutions that exist today. We have a reviewed many set top boxes in the past that we would consider much better than the PS TV today: The Amazon Fire TV, or the CloudnetGo CR11 quad core android box, to name the  most recent reviews. Even as a gaming device, some might argue that the OUYA or the Fire TV do a better job than the Playstation TV.

Disclaimer: is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to





5 responses to “Sony’s Playstation TV disappoints”

  1. Jacob Shriver Avatar
    Jacob Shriver

    Of course it disappoints. It’s Sony for crying out loud. They’ve been disappointing and losing Billions since the beginning of the century. Nothing is going to change that, not even the overhyped PS4 selling well.
    -No 1080p (that’s the biggest downer right there because of poor Vita hardware, when apparently it matters so much to hypocrite Sony fanboys)
    -No Netflix/Hulu
    -Stuck with Sony’s overpriced Vita memory cards when it doesn’t even run Vita games properly.
    Sony = lies and overhype that underdeliver. Other companies’ devices deliver better experiences.

    1. Jason M Avatar
      Jason M

      I’m still trying to figure out what exactly a “fanboy” is, since you’ve pre-empted any attempt at a rebuttal by labeling me as such. If a fanboy is someone who’s purchased Sony products for years and years and almost always been delighted with their design and performance, then I guess you’re right, that’s me.
      My problem with your points, though, isn’t one of nomenclature, it’s the hysterical hyperbole with which you present them. It’s an electronic device, nothing more. It’s not a religious debate. If it doesn’t appeal to you, then judge it on its merit as such. Calm down, is what I’m saying.

  2. William Avatar

    🙂 intelligence ftw

  3. […] owned a Japanese Vita TV and I didn’t really like it. The PS TV seems to have more or less the same flaws, but PS4 owners might consider it for the remote play possibilities, as well as “Play […]

  4. […] most of the issues. In general it has received very mixed reviews, being received as a “promising but under-delivering” […]